Identifying mental health and substance use disorders using emergency department and hospital records: A population-based retrospective cohort study of diagnostic concordance and disease attribution

12Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Administrative data are increasingly being used for surveillance and monitoring of mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) across Canada. However, the validity of the diagnostic codes specific to MHSUD is unknown in emergency departments (EDs). Our objective was to determine the concordance, and individual-level and hospital-level factors associated with concordance, between diagnosis codes assigned in ED and at discharge from hospital for MHSUD-related conditions. Design Population-based retrospective cohort study. Setting EDs and hospitals within Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCH), British Columbia, Canada. Participants 16 926 individuals who were admitted into a VCH hospital following an ED visit from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2017, contributing to 48 116 pairs of ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. Primary and secondary outcome measures We examined concordance in identifying MHSUD between the primary discharge diagnosis codes based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions (Canada) assigned in the ED and those assigned in the hospital among all ED visits resulting in a hospital admission. We calculated the percent overall agreement, positive agreement, negative agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient. We performed multiple regression analyses to identify factors independently associated with discordance. Results We found a high level of concordance for broad categories of MH conditions (overall agreement=0.89, positive agreement=0.74 and kappa=0.67), and a fair level of concordance for SUDs (overall agreement=0.89, positive agreement=0.31 and kappa=0.27). SUDs were less likely to be indicated as the primary cause in ED as opposed to in hospital (3.8% vs 11.7%). In multiple regression analyses, ED visits occurring during holidays, weekends and overnight (21:00-8:59 hours) were associated with increased odds of discordance in identifying MH conditions (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.93; 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.40; 1.30, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.42, respectively). Conclusions ED data could be used to improve surveillance and monitoring of MHSUD. Future efforts are needed to improve screening for individuals with MHSUD and subsequently connect them to treatment and follow-up care.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60808Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

4566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes

1458Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Association of Black Race With Physical and Chemical Restraint Use Among Patients Undergoing Emergency Psychiatric Evaluation

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The 5-year pre- and post-hospitalization treated prevalence of mental disorders and psychotropic medication use in critically ill patients: a Canadian population-based study

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergency department use for mental and substance use disorders: Descriptive analysis of population-based, linked administrative data in British Columbia, Canada

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L., Homayra, F., Pearce, L. A., Panagiotoglou, D., McKendry, R., Barrios, R., … Nosyk, B. (2019). Identifying mental health and substance use disorders using emergency department and hospital records: A population-based retrospective cohort study of diagnostic concordance and disease attribution. BMJ Open, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030530

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

81%

Researcher 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 20

61%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free