Radial basis functions versus geostatistics in spatial interpolations

25Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A key problem in environmental monitoring is the spatial interpolation. The main current approach in spatial interpolation is geostatistical. Geostatistics is neither the only nor the best spatial interpolation method. Actually there is no "best" method, universally valid. Choosing a particular method implies to make assumptions. The understanding of initial assumption, of the methods used, and the correct interpretation of the interpolation results are key elements of the spatial interpolation process. A powerful alternative to geostatistics in spatial interpolation is the use of the soft computing methods. They offer the potential for a more flexible, less assumption dependent approach. Artificial Neural Networks are well suited for this kind of problems, due to their ability to handle non-linear, noisy, and inconsistent data. The present paper intends to prove the advantage of using Radial Basis Functions (RBF) instead of geostatistics in spatial interpolations, based on a detailed analyze and modeling of the SIC2004 (Spatial Interpolation Comparison) dataset. © 2006 International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rusu, C., & Rusu, V. (2006). Radial basis functions versus geostatistics in spatial interpolations. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 217, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34747-9_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free