Dense subgraphs with restrictions and applications to gene annotation graphs

77Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on finding complex annotation patterns representing novel and interesting hypotheses from gene annotation data. We define a generalization of the densest subgraph problem by adding an additional distance restriction (defined by a separate metric) to the nodes of the subgraph. We show that while this generalization makes the problem NP-hard for arbitrary metrics, when the metric comes from the distance metric of a tree, or an interval graph, the problem can be solved optimally in polynomial time. We also show that the densest subgraph problem with a specified subset of vertices that have to be included in the solution can be solved optimally in polynomial time. In addition, we consider other extensions when not just one solution needs to be found, but we wish to list all subgraphs of almost maximum density as well. We apply this method to a dataset of genes and their annotations obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). A user evaluation confirms that the patterns found in the distance restricted densest subgraph for a dataset of photomorphogenesis genes are indeed validated in the literature; a control dataset validates that these are not random patterns. Interestingly, the complex annotation patterns potentially lead to new and as yet unknown hypotheses. We perform experiments to determine the properties of the dense subgraphs, as we vary parameters, including the number of genes and the distance. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saha, B., Hoch, A., Khuller, S., Raschid, L., & Zhang, X. N. (2010). Dense subgraphs with restrictions and applications to gene annotation graphs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6044 LNBI, pp. 456–472). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12683-3_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free