Impact of antihypertensive treatment on maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by chronic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

78Citations
Citations of this article
230Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background-Chronic hypertension complicates around 3% of all pregnancies. There is evidence that treating severe hypertension reduces maternal morbidity. This study aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of antihypertensive agents treating chronic hypertension in pregnancy to determine the effect of this intervention. Methods and Results-Medline (via OVID), Embase (via OVID) and the Cochrane Trials Register were searched from their earliest entries until November 30, 2016. All randomized controlled trials evaluating antihypertensive treatments for chronic hypertension in pregnancy were included. Data were extracted and analyzed in Stata (version 14.1). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (1166 women) were identified for meta-analysis. A clinically important reduction in the incidence of severe hypertension was seen with antihypertensive treatment versus no antihypertensive treatment/placebo (5 studies, 446 women; risk ratio 0.33, 95%CI 0.19- 0.56; I2 0.0%). There was no difference in the incidence of superimposed pre-eclampsia (7 studies, 727 women; risk ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.49-1.11; I2 28.1%), stillbirth/neonatal death (4 studies, 667 women; risk ratio 0.37, 95%CI 0.11-1.26; I2 0.0%), birth weight (7 studies, 802 women; weighted mean difference -60 g, 95%CI -200 to 80 g; I2 0.0%), or small for gestational age (4 studies, 369 women; risk ratio 1.01, 95%CI 0.53-1.94; I2 0.0%) with antihypertensive treatment versus no treatment/placebo. Conclusions-Antihypertensive treatment reduces the risk of severe hypertension in pregnant women with chronic hypertension. A considerable paucity of data exists to guide choice of antihypertensive agent. Adequately powered head-to-head randomized controlled trials of commonly used antihypertensive agents are required to inform prescribing.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Flowchart of articles identified reporting randomized controlled trials of antihypertensive agents for the treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy.
  • Table 2. Studies Excluded From the Meta-Analysis and Rationale
  • Table 2. Continued
  • Table 2. Continued
  • Table 3. Definitions of Severe Hypertension and Superimposed Pre-Eclampsia for Each Included Study
  • Figure 2. Risk-of-bias assessment of each study included in the meta-analysis. A, Risk-of-bias assessment by individual assessment of criteria for each study. Randomized controlled trials are listed alphabetically by author name. B, Risk-of-bias items presented as percentages across all included studies. *Redman et al39 and Mutch et al37 both publish data from the same study; only the Redman article has been assessed for risk of bias. Risk-of-bias summary shows review authors’ judgments about each risk-of-bias domain in randomized controlled trials on efficacy of antihypertensive treatment for chronic hypertension in pregnancy.
  • Figure 3. Maternal outcomes: active vs nonactive treatment. A, Severe hypertension. B, Superimposed pre-eclampsia. *Where studies had more than 1 active treatment arm, the data from the active treatment arms were pooled and compared with the non-active-treatment data. Studies are listed in order of the year they were published. Antihypertensive agents used in each study are listed in Table 1. The numbers of participants experiencing severe hypertension or superimposed pre-eclampsia in each treatment group are denoted as “n,” with the total number of participants with chronic hypertension in each study arm denoted as “N.” Forest plots of the meta-analysis for each maternal outcome: active vs nonactive treatment. The gray rectangles represent the risk ratio for each study and are sized in proportion to the weight assigned to the study within the analysis. The red dotted line represents to overall risk ratio for each outcome and the lateral tips of the diamond represent the 95% confidence interval for the summary measure.
  • Figure 4. Perinatal outcomes: active vs nonactive treatment. A, Stillbirth or neonatal death. B, Birth weight. C, Small-for-gestational-age infants. *Where studies had more than 1 active treatment arm, the data from the active treatment arms were pooled and compared with the nonactive treatment data. Studies are listed in order of the year they were published. Antihypertensive agents used in each study are listed in Table 1. The numbers of participants experiencing a stillbirth/neonatal death or small-for-gestational-age infant in each treatment group are denoted as “n,” with the total number of participants with chronic hypertension in each study arm denoted as “N.” Forest plots of the metaanalysis for each perinatal outcome: active vs nonactive treatment. The gray rectangles represent the risk ratio for each study and are sized in proportion to the weight assigned to the study within the analysis. The red dotted line represents to overall risk ratio for each outcome and the lateral tips of the diamond represent the 95% confidence interval for the summary measure.

References Powered by Scopus

48586Citations
9281Readers
Get full text
32697Citations
4680Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hypertension Across a Woman's Life Cycle

180Citations
532Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Webster, L. M., Conti-Ramsden, F., Seed, P. T., Webb, A. J., Nelson-Piercy, C., & Chappell, L. C. (2017, May 1). Impact of antihypertensive treatment on maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by chronic hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005526

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 63

65%

Researcher 20

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 82

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 19

17%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 10

9%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 137

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0