Deep learning-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram-based genotype prediction for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a pilot study

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Given the psychosocial and ethical burden, patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMs) could benefit from the establishment of genetic probability prior to the test. This study aimed to develop a simple tool to provide genotype prediction for HCMs. Methods: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was built with the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) of 124 HCMs who underwent genetic testing (GT), externally tested by predicting the genotype on another HCMs cohort (n = 54), and compared with the conventional methods (the Mayo and Toronto score). Using a third cohort of HCMs (n = 76), the role of the network in risk stratification was explored by calculating the sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk scorers (HCM risk-SCD) across the predicted genotypes. Score-CAM was employed to provide a visual explanation of the network. Results: Overall, 80 of 178 HCMs (45%) were genotype-positive. Using the 12-lead ECG as input, the network showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83–0.96) on the test set, outperforming the Mayo score (0.69 [95% CI, 0.65–0.78], p < 0.001) and the Toronto score (0.69 [95% CI, 0.64–0.75], p < 0.001). The network classified the third cohort into two groups (predicted genotype-negative vs. predicted genotype-positive). Compared with the former, patients predicted genotype-positive had a significantly higher HCM risk-SCD (0.04 ± 0.03 vs. 0.03 ± 0.02, p <0.01). Visualization indicated that the prediction was heavily influenced by the limb lead. Conclusions: The network demonstrated a promising ability in genotype prediction and risk assessment in HCM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, L. T., Fu, G. S., & Jiang, C. Y. (2023). Deep learning-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram-based genotype prediction for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a pilot study. Annals of Medicine, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2235564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free