Shortened versions of Fennema-sherman mathematic attitude scales employing trace information

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper aimed at providing a simple and direct method for shortening the lengthy 108-item Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitude Scales (FSMAS). The method proposed uses the trace information (widely used in other popular procedures such as principal component analysis and regression analysis) as the criterion for item selection. Results for half-length FSMAS versions (54 items) constructed using the trace-information criterion compared favourably with Mulhern and Rae's (1998) 51-item FSMAS short form. But unlike the later short form, our method retained as much variance as possible in the original 108-items and maximized the correlations, and hence predictive validity, with the full-length FSMAS version. The appropriateness of selecting items from a larger item pool based on employing a trace-information criterion is discussed within the context of the domain-sampling model.

References Powered by Scopus

A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GENDER COMPARISONS OF MATHEMATICS ATTITUDES AND AFFECT: A Meta‐Analysis

399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How are students’ attitudes related to learning outcomes?

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitude Scales with lower-primary teachers

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a Performing Creative Characteristics Scale (PCCS) for Chinese young children

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sachs, J., & Leung, S. O. (2007). Shortened versions of Fennema-sherman mathematic attitude scales employing trace information. Psychologia, 50(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2007.224

Readers over time

‘10‘18‘19‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Psychology 1

17%

Mathematics 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0