Anisotropic scaling models of rock density and the earth's surface gravity field

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we consider a anisotropic scaling approach to understanding rock density and surface gravity which naturally accounts for wide range variability and anomalies at all scales. This approach is empirically justified by the growing body of evidence that geophysical fields including topography and density are scaling over wide range ranges. Theoretically it is justified since scale invariance is a (geo)dynamical symmetry principle which is expected to hold in the absence of symmetry breaking mechanisms. Unfortunately to date most scaling approaches have been self-similiar, i.e. they have assumed not only scale invariant but also isotropic dynamics. In contrast, most nonscaling approaches recognize the anisotropy (e.g. the strata), but implicitly assume that the latter is independent of scale. In this paper, we argue that the dynamics are scaling but highly anisotropic i.e. with scale dependent differential anisotropy. By using empirical density statistics in the crust; and a statistical theory of high Prandtl number convection in the mantle we argue that P(K, kz) ≈ (|K/ks|Hz+|kz/ks|)-s/Hz is a reasonable model for the 3-D spectrum (K is the horizontal wavevector and K is its modulus, kz a vertical wavenumber), (s, Hz) are fundamental exponents which we estimate as (5.3, 3), (3,3) in the crust and mantle respectively. We theoretically derive expressions for the corresponding surface gravity spectrum. For scales smaller than ≈ 100 km, the anisotropic crust model of the density (with flat top and bottom) using empirically determined vertical and horizontal density spectra is sufficient to explain the (Bouguer) gz spectra. However, the crust thickness is highly variable and the crust-mantle density contrast is very large. By considering isostatic equilibrium, and using global gravity and topography data, we show that this thickness variability is the dominant contribution to the surface gz spectrum over the range ≈ 100 ≈ 1000 km. Using estimates of mantle properties (viscosity, thermal conductivity, thermal expansion coefficient etc.), we show that the mantle contribution to the mean spectrum is strongest at ≈ 1000 km, and is comparable to the variable crust thickness contribution. Overall, we produce a model which is compatible with both the observed (horizontal and vertical) density heterogeneity and surface gravity anomaly statistics over a range of meters to several thousand kilometers. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lovejoy, S., Gaonac’H, H., & Schertzer, D. (2008). Anisotropic scaling models of rock density and the earth’s surface gravity field. In Progress in Geomathematics (pp. 151–193). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69496-0_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free