Is primal better than dual

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chapelle proposed to train support vector machines (SVMs) in the primal form by Newton's method and discussed its advantages. In this paper we propose training L2 SVMs in the dual form in the similar way that Chapelle proposed. Namely, we solve the quadratic programming problem for the initial working set of training data by Newton's method, delete from the working set the data with negative Lagrange multipliers as well as the data with the associated margins larger than or equal to 1, add to the working set training data with the associated margins less than 1, and repeat training the SVM until the working set does not change. The matrix associated with the dual quadratic form is positive definite while that with the primal quadratic form is positive semi-definite. And the former matrix requires less kernel evaluation. Computer experiments show that for most cases training the SVM by the proposed method is more stable and faster than training the SVM in the primal. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abe, S. (2009). Is primal better than dual. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5768 LNCS, pp. 854–863). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04274-4_88

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free