In this paper, it is argued that "coreference" annotations, as performed in the MUC community for example, go well beyond annotation of the relation of coreference proper. As a result, it is not always clear what semantic relation these annotations are encoding. The paper discusses a number of problems with these annotations and concludes that rethinking of the coreference task is needed before the task is expanded. In particular, it suggests a division of labor whereby annotation of the coreference relation proper is separated from other tasks such as annotation of bound anaphora and of the relation between a subject and a predicative NP.
CITATION STYLE
Van Deemter, K., & Kibble, R. (2000). On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100750105966
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.