Comparison and evaluation of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures in brain MRI

66Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The automation of segmentation of medical images is an active research area. However, there has been criticism of the standard of evaluation of methods. We have comprehensively evaluated four novel methods of automatically segmenting subcortical structures using volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based measures. Two of the methods are atlas-based - classifier fusion and labelling (CFL) and expectation-maximisation segmentation using a dynamic brain atlas (EMS), and two model-based - profile active appearance models (PAM) and Bayesian appearance models (BAM). Each method was applied to the segmentation of 18 subcortical structures in 270 subjects from a diverse pool varying in age, disease, sex and image acquisition parameters. Our results showed that all four methods perform on par with recently published methods. CFL performed significantly better than the other three methods according to all three classes of metrics. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babalola, K. O., Patenaude, B., Aljabar, P., Schnabel, J., Kennedy, D., Crum, W., … Rueckert, D. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures in brain MRI. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5241 LNCS, pp. 409–416). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free