Performance assessment of double corrugated tubes in a tube-in-shell heat exchanger

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, the performance of double corrugated tubes applied in a tube-in-shell heat exchanger is analysed and compared to the performance of a heat exchanger equipped with straight tubes. The CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis was performed considering a turbulent flow regime at several mass flow rates. It is observed that the double corrugated geometry does not have a significant impact on the pressure drop inside the analysed heat exchanger, while it has the potential to increase its thermal performance by up to 25%. The #–NTU (effectiveness–number of transfer units) relation also demonstrates the advantage of using double corrugated tubes in tube-in-shell heat exchangers over straight tubes.

References Powered by Scopus

A novel concept for convective heat transfer enhancement

901Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forced convection heat transfer in helically rib-roughened tubes

586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shell side CFD analysis of a small shell-and-tube heat exchanger

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analysis of thermal efficiency of a corrugated double-tube heat exchanger with nanofluids

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental characterization of a double tube heat exchanger with different corrugated tubes and shells

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF CORRUGATED HELICALLY COILED TUBE -IN -TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Navickaitė, K., Penzel, M., Bahl, C. R. H., & Engelbrecht, K. (2021). Performance assessment of double corrugated tubes in a tube-in-shell heat exchanger. Energies, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051343

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

86%

Energy 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0