Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training combined with exercise on patient-reported outcomes measures in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) added to the exercise or superimposed on voluntary contractions on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: This systematic review was described according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from a systematic literature search in five electronic databases (PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) in April 2022. We described the effects of intervention according to each PROMs (scores for Pain; Self-reported functional ability; Symptoms (hear clicking, swelling, catching, restricted range of motion, and stiffness); Daily living function; Sports function; and Quality of life) and used a random-effect model to examine the impact of NMES plus exercise on pain compared with exercise in people with knee OA. Results: Six RCTs (n = 367) were included. In the qualitative synthesis, the systematic literature analysis showed improvement in pain after NMES plus exercise compared with exercise alone in three studies. The other three studies revealed no difference between groups in pain, although similar improvement after treatments. In the meta-analysis, NMES at a specific joint angle combined with exercise was not superior to exercise alone in pain management (standardized mean difference = −0.33, 95% CI = −1.05 to 0.39, p = 0.37). There was no additional effect of NMES on exercise on self-reported functional ability, stiffness, and physical function compared with exercise alone. In only one study, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports function, and quality of life improved after whole-body electrostimulation combined with exercise. Conclusion: This review found insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of NMES combined with exercise in treating knee OA considering PROMs. While pain relief was observed in some studies, more high-quality clinical trials are needed to support the use of NMES added to the exercise in clinical practice. Electrical stimulation in a whole-body configuration combined with exercise shows promise as an alternative treatment option.

References Powered by Scopus

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

37050Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

16809Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

6191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Are adjunct treatments effective in improving pain and function when added to exercise therapy in people with patellofemoral pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis and appraisal of the quality of interventions

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of whole-body electromyostimulation on knee pain and physical function in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Effects of a Balance Training Program With and Without Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dynamic Balance in Recreationally Active Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carvalho, M. T. X., Guesser Pinheiro, V. H., & Alberton, C. L. (2024, January 1). Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training combined with exercise on patient-reported outcomes measures in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy Research International. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2062

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Researcher 3

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0