Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Recently, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed and adapted to body mass index (BMI). This study describes the impact on prevalence of the application of both criteria in overweight and lean patients. Methods: Patients who were evaluated for liver steatosis by transient elastography were included and divided according to BMI (≥25 kg/m2 and <25 kg/m2) and classified as NAFLD or MAFLD, according to metabolic abnormalities. Differences in prevalence were evaluated applying both criteria. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate independent associations of metabolic abnormalities and liver steatosis in lean patients. Results: 3847 patients were included. In overweight patients (61%), the prevalence NAFLD was 63.6% and 65.3% for MAFLD (p = 0.22). In contrast, the prevalence of MAFLD was lower (7.9% vs. 18.3%, p ≤ 0.001) in lean patients. In this group, higher age, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and waist circumference showed independent association with liver steatosis. Conclusion: The application of NAFLD/MAFLD criteria did not show prevalence differences in overweight patients. With MAFLD criteria, the prevalence is lower in lean patients, but patients with high risk of progression of liver disease for steatosis were identified, according to their metabolic abnormalities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ordoñez-Vázquez, A. L., Juárez-Hernández, E., Zuarth-Vázquez, J. M., Ramos-Ostos, M. H., Uribe, M., Castro-Narro, G., & López-Méndez, I. (2022). Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free