When are actively balanced biphasic ('Lilly') stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? I Historical background; Pt resting potential;Q studies

70Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Actively balanced ('Lilly') stimulating current waveforms are generally considered to give very 'safe' stimulation. Although this is perfectly true, the specification of the necessary waveform generators in neurological prostheses demands additional complexity, and probably additional expense and development time as well. The paper and its companion enquire whether the use of simple, passively charge-balanced stimulating pulses is equally safe, provided the stimulation parameters and circuitry are designed with appropriate care. It is concluded that, in respect of safe deliverable charge density per pulse at the electrode, release of noxious products and stimulating effectiveness, simple pulses need give no worse performance; in some circumstances they may give better. © 1986 International Federation for Medical & Biological Engineering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donaldson, N. de N., & Donaldson, P. E. K. (1986). When are actively balanced biphasic ('Lilly’) stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? I Historical background; Pt resting potential;Q studies. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 24(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441604

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free