Development of a battery of instruments for detailed measurement of health status in patients with COPD in routine care: The Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument

63Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compose a battery of instruments that provides a detailed assessment of health status (HS) in COPD but that is applicable and clinically meaningful in routine care. Methods: In a previous study, we developed the Nijmegen Integral Assessment Framework (NIAF) that organizes existing tests and instruments by the sub-domains of HS they measure. Based on clinical and statistical criteria (correlation coefficients and Cronbach alpha's) we selected for each sub-domain instruments from the NIAF. A COPD-study group was used to determine c-scores, and two control groups were used to determine the score ranges indicating normal functioning versus clinically relevant problems for each sub-domain. Existing questionnaire completion software (TestOrganiser) was adapted to enhance clinical applicability. Results: The NCSI measures eleven sub-domains of physiological functioning, symptoms, functional impairment, and quality of life. The TestOrganiser automatically processes the data and produces the graphical PatientProfileChart, which helps to easily interpret results. This envisages the problem areas and discrepancies between the different sub-domains. Conclusion: The NCSI provides a valid and detailed picture of a patient's HS within 15-25 min. In combination with the PatientProfileChart, the NCSI can be used perfectly in routine care as screening instrument and as a guide in patient-tailored treatment. © 2009 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peters, J. B., Daudey, L., Heijdra, Y. F., Molema, J., Dekhuijzen, P. N. R., & Vercoulen, J. H. (2009). Development of a battery of instruments for detailed measurement of health status in patients with COPD in routine care: The Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9502-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free