Evaluation and visualization of radiogenomic modeling frameworks for the prediction of normal tissue toxicities

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We explore techniques for the evaluation and visualization of radiogenomic data-driven models in an effort to investigate the integration of genetic variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms[SNPs] and copy number variations[CNVs]) with dosimetric and clinical variables in modeling radiation-induced rectal bleeding (RB). One hundred (N=100) patients who underwent curative hypofractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 22 fractions) between 2002-2010 were retrospectively genotyped for SNPs and CNVs in six genes: XRCC1, XRCC3, VEGFa, TGFβ1, ERCC2 and SOD2. A logistic regression modeling approach was used to assess the risk of severe RB (Grade ≥ 3) using dosimetric, clinical and biological variables. Statistical resampling based on cross-validation was used to evaluate model predictive power and generalizability to unseen data. NTCP-colorwashed principle component analysis (PCA) and vector biplots were used to visualize the quality of model fit. Biological variable XRCC1 CNV showed good overall fit to RB outcome data (p<0.001). When added to the logistic regression modeling, XRCC1 CNV improved classification performance over standard dosimetric models by 33.5%. No clinical variables were found to adequately fit the data. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated that the combination of genetic and dosimetric variables could provide significant improvement in NTCP prediction using data-driven approaches. Moreover, we have shown that visualization techniques aid in interpreting multivariate model predictions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coates, J., Jeyaseelan, A. K., Ybarra, N., Tao, J., David, M., Faria, S., … El Naqa, I. (2015). Evaluation and visualization of radiogenomic modeling frameworks for the prediction of normal tissue toxicities. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 51, pp. 517–520). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free