A computer-aided diagnostic algorithm improves the accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial thrombi

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives-We investigated whether transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) assisted with a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) algorithm was superior to TEE in diagnosing left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a single prospective study. Methods-Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in patients with AF, and images were reconstructed. Gray level co-occurrence matrix-based features were calculatedand then classified using an artificial neural network. The original data andprocessed images by the CAD system were studied by 5 radiologists independently in a blind manner. The diagnostic performance of each radiologist was evaluated. Results-One hundred thirty patients with AF were investigated. Thirty-one patients (23.9%) had a diagnosis of LA/LAA thrombi. The mean sensitivity ± SD of TEE for LA/LAA thrombi was 0.933 ± 0.027, which was noticeably improved by CAD (0.955 ±0.021; P < .05). The specificity of TEE was 0.811 ± 0.055, which was markedly lower than that by TEE plus CAD (0.970 ± 0.009; P < .05). The positive predictive value of TEE was low (0.613 ± 0.073) compared to that of TEE plus CAD (0.908 ± 0.027; P < .01). The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for TEE was 0.834 ± 0.009(95% confidence interval [CI], 0.815-0.852), which was markedly lower than the Az for TEE plus CAD (0.932 ± 0.005; 95% CI, 0.921-0.943). The use of CAD significantly improved the Az values for all 5 radiologists (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Y. T., Shen, J. X., Xue, F. H., Da Cheng, H., & Qu, X. F. (2014). A computer-aided diagnostic algorithm improves the accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial thrombi. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 33(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.1.83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free