Optimal duration of an early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis: Randomised controlled trial

57Citations
Citations of this article
150Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Numerous early intervention services targeting young people with psychosis have been established, based on the premise that reducing treatment delay and providing intensive treatment in the initial phase of psychosis can improve long-term outcome. Aims To establish the effect of extending a specialised early intervention treatment for first-episode psychosis by 1 year. Method A randomised, single-blind controlled trial (NCT01202357) compared a 1-year extension of specialised early intervention with step-down care in patients who had all received a 2-year intensive early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis. Results Patients receiving an additional year of specialised intervention had better outcomes in functioning, negative and depressive symptoms and treatment default rate than those managed by step-down psychiatric care. Conclusions Extending the period of specialised early intervention is clinically desirable but may not be feasible in lower-income countries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, W. C., Chan, G. H. K., Jim, O. T. T., Lau, E. S. K., Hui, C. L. M., Chan, S. K. W., … Chen, E. Y. H. (2015). Optimal duration of an early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.150144

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free