Subjectivity annotation of the microblog 2011 realtime adhoc relevance judgments

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this work, we extend the Microblog dataset with subjectivity annotations. Our aim is twofold; first, we want to provide a high-quality, multiply-annotated gold standard of subjectivity annotations for the relevance assessments of the real-time adhoc task. Second, we randomly sample the rest of the dataset and annotate it for subjectivity once, in order to create a complementary annotated dataset that is at least an order of magnitude larger than the gold standard. As a result we have 2,389 tweets that have been annotated by multiple humans and 75,761 tweets that have been annotated by one annotator. We discuss issues like inter-annotator agreement, the time that it took annotators to classify tweets in correlation to their subjective content and lastly, the distribution of subjective tweets in relation to topic categorization. The annotated datasets and all relevant anonymised information are freely available for research purposes. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paltoglou, G., & Buckley, K. (2013). Subjectivity annotation of the microblog 2011 realtime adhoc relevance judgments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7814 LNCS, pp. 344–355). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36973-5_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free