Social inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study

45Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. We investigated social inequalities in walking speed in early old age. Methods. Walking speed was measured by timed 8-ft (2.44 m) test in 6,345 individuals, with mean age of 61.1 (SD 6.0) years. Current or last known civil service employment grade defined socioeconomic position. Results. Mean walking speed was 1.36 (SD 0.29) m/s in men and 1.21 (SD 0.30) in women. Average age- and ethnicity-adjusted walking speed was approximately 13% higher in the highest employment grade compared with the lowest. Based on the relative index of inequality (RII), the difference in walking speed across the social hierarchy was 0.15 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.18) in men and 0.17 m/s (0.12-0.22) in women, corresponding to an age-related difference of 18.7 (13.6-23.8) years in men and 14.9 (9.9-19.9) years in women. The RII for slow walking speed (logistic model for lowest sex-specific quartile vs others) adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity was 3.40 (2.64-4.36). Explanatory factors for the social gradient in walking speed included Short-Form 36 physical functioning, labor market status, financial insecurity, height, and body mass index. Demographic, psychosocial, behavioral, biologic, and health factors in combination accounted for 40% of social inequality in walking speed. Conclusion. Social inequality in walking speed is substantial in early old age and reflects many factors beyond the direct effects of physical health. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brunner, E., Shipley, M., Spencer, V., Kivimaki, M., Chandola, T., Gimeno, D., … Marmot, M. (2009). Social inequality in walking speed in early old age in the Whitehall II study. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64(10), 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free