When work came home: Formation of feeling rules in the context of a pandemic

8Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The shift of middle-class jobs to home settings, which occurred as a result of COVID-19 health measures that also closed schools and daycares, introduced dynamic changes to everyday life. We investigate these changes drawing on data from our study in which participants in Nova Scotia, Canada, who were working at home due to the pandemic, wrote journal entries in response to weekly prompts. Participants not only documented changes to their routines and challenges of managing work and parenting simultaneously and in the same physical space, but also reflected on their conflicted emotions about life during the pandemic and their vision for life as things return to “normal.” Their narratives prompt us to consider these experiences and emotions in relation to Arlie Hochschild's scholarship on feeling rules, emotion work, and gender and work more broadly. We find that from our participants’ struggle to meet existing expectations on activities and emotion while simultaneously managing new sets of protocols and feeling rules what emerges is a resistance to norms of busyness, productivity, and exhaustion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudrum, S., Rondinelli, E., Carlson, J., Frank, L., Brickner, R. K., & Casey, R. (2022). When work came home: Formation of feeling rules in the context of a pandemic. Emotion, Space and Society, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free