Ethical and medicolegal considerations

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite the fact that physicians seek to provide excellent clinical care for their patients, issues of medical malpractice may arise for even the most conscientious and well-trained physician. Urologists face an 11% annual risk of being involved in a malpractice claim, with about 3% of urologists per year facing a claim that results in a payment to a plaintiff. As such, it is important for urologists to be informed about medical malpractice. This chapter seeks to inform urologists about the medical malpractice system in the United States, provide data about malpractice claims in urology, educate readers about the malpractice claim process, and review strategies for preventing malpractice claims, as well as provide an overview on malpractice insurance and tort reform. In addition, we discuss medicolegal considerations in new surgical technology and techniques, as well as inform urologists about ethical considerations that they should be knowledgeable about in their practice, such as the principles of medical ethics, informed consent, conflicts of interest, expert witness testimony, and in-office ancillary procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hampson, L. A., & Meng, M. V. (2017). Ethical and medicolegal considerations. In Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery (pp. 59–71). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free