Building Bridges with the Right Tools: Modality and the Standard Model

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current state of the relationship between metaphysics and the philosophy of science might appear to be one best described as ‘hostility on both sides’. In an attempt to bridge this gap, French and McKenzie (Eur J Analytic Philos 8:42–59, 2012) have suggested a twofold strategy: on the one hand, if metaphysics is to be taken to have something direct to say about reality, the implications of physics need to be properly appreciated; on the other, one does not have to agree with the claim that a prioristic metaphysics should be dismissed or even discontinued, since we should value scientifically disinterested metaphysics as a ‘toolbox’ for philosophers of science. It is in the context of this strategy that I want to approach the issue of understanding the symmetry principles that feature in the Standard Model of modern physics. I shall suggest that the dispositional analysis of laws is incapable of accommodating such principles. However, there are other tools in the metaphysical toolbox that one can draw upon to help capture the nature of such symmetries corresponding to the second part of the above strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

French, S. (2017). Building Bridges with the Right Tools: Modality and the Standard Model. In European Studies in Philosophy of Science (Vol. 5, pp. 37–47). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53730-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free