Self-design vs. designer theories and wetland restoration and creation

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Wetland restoration and succession are essentially attempts to accelerate and direct succession. However, competing theories about the nature of succession exist. One theory developed by F. E. Clements postulated that all the vegetation in an area would eventually reach a final, stable stage that he called the climax. This deterministic succession theory, now called the self-design theory, has been adopted in numerous restoration/creation projects. It implies that environmental conditions are the main determinant of the vegetation that develops. An alterna- tive theory of succession, associated with H. A. Gleason, emphasizes that the characteristics of each plant species (e.g., seed dispersal potential) and contingent environmental factors (e.g., disturbances) have a major influence on the compo- sition of the vegetation that develops and that there is no fixed end point. This individualistic theory of succession in the restoration field is known as the designer theory. Most plant ecologists today are advocates of the designer theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Valk, A. (2018). Self-design vs. designer theories and wetland restoration and creation. In The Wetland Book: I: Structure and Function, Management, and Methods (pp. 55–58). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free