Are social-psychological smoking prevention programs effective? The waterloo study

80Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent evaluations of smoking prevention programs have suggested considerable promise for curricula emphasizing resistance of social influences. The present study extends these evaluations by addressing key methodological limitations in previous work. Twenty-two matched schools were randomized to experimental and control conditions. Grade 6 students received a 6-week core curriculum, plus additional sessions through Grades 7 and 8. Questionnaires, and saliva samples to validate self-reported smoking behavior, were collected at five times over the 2-year study period. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined program impact for five levels of initial smoking experience, ranging from "never smoker" through regular, weekly smoker. Significant program effects were documented, most clearly for those having some experience with smoking before the program began and for those with smoking peer and family models. This study provides the methodologically most rigorous test to date of social influence programs for smoking prevention and documents for the first time significant effects for those at high risk for smoking. © 1985 Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flay, B. R., Ryan, K. B., Best, J. A., Brown, K. S., Kersell, M. W., d’Avernas, J. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Are social-psychological smoking prevention programs effective? The waterloo study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free