Entrepreneurial learning under uncertainty: exploring the role of self-efficacy and perceived complexity

37Citations
Citations of this article
184Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The entrepreneurial learning literature remains underdeveloped and lacks a clear understanding of the learning process. Building on an in-depth case study of four Scandinavian gourmet restauranteurs, we argue that learning to act on entrepreneurial tasks involves opening-up and focusing processes. We propose a process model that specifies how changing perceptions of complexity and self-efficacy influence an individual’s preference for experimentation (opening up) and modelling (focusing) when acquiring new experience. Specifically, in situations perceived as complex, individuals will likely opt for modelling; however, individuals who feel highly self-efficacious will likely rely more on experimentation.

References Powered by Scopus

Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

35785Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges

11670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

8794Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predicting motivational outcomes in social entrepreneurship: Roles of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and situational fit

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Entrepreneurs’ Decisions in Perceived Environmental Uncertainty

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Facing and responding to the COVID-19 threat – an empirical examination of MSMEs

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markowska, M., & Wiklund, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial learning under uncertainty: exploring the role of self-efficacy and perceived complexity. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 32(7–8), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1713222

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 17

21%

Researcher 8

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 55

65%

Social Sciences 13

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

14%

Psychology 4

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free