Systematic identification of cell size regulators in budding yeast

  • Soifer I
  • Barkai N
53Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cell size is determined by a complex interplay between growth and division, involving multiple cellular pathways. To identify systematically processes affecting size control in G1 in budding yeast, we imaged and analyzed the cell cycle of millions of individual cells representing 591 mutants implicated in size control. Quantitative metric distinguished mutants affecting the mechanism of size control from the majority of mutants that have a perturbed size due to indirect effects modulating cell growth. Overall, we identified 17 negative and dozens positive size control regulators, with the negative regulators forming a small network centered on elements of mitotic exit network. Some elements of the translation machinery affected size control with a notable distinction between the deletions of parts of small and large ribosomal subunit: parts of small ribosomal subunit tended to regulate size control, while parts of the large subunit affected cell growth. Analysis of small cells revealed additional size control mechanism that functions in G2/M, complementing the primary size control in G1. Our study provides new insights about size control mechanisms in budding yeast. image New regulators of cell size are identified using a mutant screen based on high‐throughput time‐lapse microscopy. A quantitative framework distinguishes direct regulators of size control from mutants whose size is altered due to reduced growth rate. High‐throughput time‐lapse microscopy identified 17 negative and dozens positive regulators of cell size at START. Negative regulators form a small genetic network centered around the mitotic exit network, suggesting that G1 length depends on processes occurring prior to cell separation. The small ribosomal subunit affects size control, while the large subunit influences cell growth only, suggesting a role for translation initiation in size control. A backup mode of size control that functions in the budded phase is suggested.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Flow cytometry pre-screen. A Distributions of DNA content in the wild-type (WT) and the two prototype deletions of positive (bck2) and negative regulator (whi5) of size control. Shown is the histogram of DNA content of logarithmic populations together with fitted distributions of cell cycle phases: G1 (red), S (blue) and G2 (green). B Cumulative distributions of forward scatter of WT, whi5 and bck2. C Correlations between the measured percentages of G1 cells and of forward scatters between the two repeats of the screen. D Median FSC of all mutants and cumulative distribution of average forward scatters of mutants previously classified whi by Jorgensen et al (2002) and cumulative size distributions of the largest and the smallest 5% mutants previously found (left panel). Cumulative distributions of median FSC of all mutants, smallest 5% of mutants and the largest 5% of mutants from Jorgensen et al (2002) (right panel). E Pearson correlations between the median forward scatters/microscopic volume estimates/electronic volume estimates from this screen and previous screens
  • Figure 2. In vivo monitoring of division pattern in budding yeast reveals weak size control on glucose and at lower growth rates. A Live imaging of multiple division cycles: composite image showing wild-type cells expressing Cdc10-GFP (green, bud neck) and Acs2-mCherry (red, nucleus) growing in our setup. We confirmed that in our setup the phototoxicity was minimal (Supplementary Fig S2A). B Automated image analysis for tracking cells over time: composite image showing wild-type cells as in (A) with the contours found by the automated image analysis. Circle denotes the nucleus. C Tracking cells allows for automatic determination of cytokinesis, START and the specific growth rate in G1. Shown is the volume as a function of time (circles) and the intensity of the bud neck (triangles) of a representative cell measured with a time resolution of 1 min. Gray lines denote cytokinesis and START (bud neck
  • Figure 3. Summary of the microscopic screen. A Reproducibility of measurements of size at budding. Median budding size of the same strain between the two repeats of the measurement. B Many mutant strains have a perturbed size at budding. Histogram of cell sizes at budding of mutant strains versus the cell size at budding of the 60 repeats of the wild-type strain. C, D Small-budding strains are mostly deficient in the elements of translation machinery, while large-budding strains belong to diverse functional groups. Pie charts
  • Figure 4. Classification of the mutant strains. Classification of the mutant strains according to the dependency of length of G1 and volume increase (DV) in G1 on the birth size. Strains fell into one of the nine categories with shorter and longer G1 and decreased and increased DV in G1. See Materials and Methods for the details of statistical analysis. Number of strains falling into each category with the estimated number of false positives is indicated. Insets show example strains in each category. Note that mutants having shorter G1 but normal volume increase were not classified as negative regulators, since they are all expected to be false positives.
  • Table 1. List of identified negative regulators.
  • Figure 5. Negative regulators of the size control form a network of genetic interactions and belong to cell polarity and mitotic exit network. A Box plot showing relative length of G1 in each size bin (median length of G1 for the strain – median length of G1 of wild-type cells born at the same size) in the mutants belonging to the negative regulator category compared to the wild-type. yor082c (ORF overlapping WHI5). Red plus markers denote outlying bins. B Relative DV in G1 (median DV in G1 for the strain – median DV in G1 of wild-type cells born at the same size) in the mutants belonging to the negative regulator category. C Dependency of the length of G1 and DV in G1 on the size at birth in the mutants that belong to the negative regulator category (representative mutants, average across size bin), see Supplementary Fig S6 for all mutants. At least 500 cells are measured for each mutant. D Genetic and physical interactions between negative regulators of START. Red line: genetic interaction, violet line: physical interaction. Blue nodes: mitotic exit/polar growth genes, pink nodes: glucose signaling genes.
  • Figure 6. Protein synthesis has a positive effect on START. A, B Deletions of ribosomal genes have a decreased average cell size (A) and a diverse average budding size (B). Cumulative distribution of average cell
  • Figure 7. Backup size control in the budded phase of small mutants. A Duration of the budded phase is independent of the duration of G1.

References Powered by Scopus

759Citations
370Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

227Citations
182Readers
Get full text
123Citations
291Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soifer, I., & Barkai, N. (2014). Systematic identification of cell size regulators in budding yeast. Molecular Systems Biology, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145345

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 72

55%

Researcher 45

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76

56%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 51

38%

Physics and Astronomy 6

4%

Computer Science 3

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0