Erratum to: Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in neurocritical patients: a cohort study (Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, (2022), 36, 6, (1621-1628), 10.1007/s10877-022-00805-5)

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patients with acute brain injury have been excluded in the majority of the randomized clinical trials which evaluated a lung protective strategy in patients with acute respiratory failure. It remains unclear if low tidal volume, higher PEEP levels and recruitment maneuvers by increasing both the intracranial and intrathoracic pressure and by leading to a permissible hypercapnia could furthermore deteriorate the acute brain injury and the final outcome. Mechanical power has been associated with the outcome in ARDS patients without brain injury. Jiang et al. demonstrated in neurocritical patients that non-survivors had a higher mechanical power compared to survivors. Mechanical power was associated with an increase in intensive care mortality risk and also to an enhanced risk of hospital mortality, prolonged intensive care length of stay and fewer ventilatory free days; in addition, the mechanical power could better predict mortality compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiumello, D., & Coppola, S. (2022, December 1). Erratum to: Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in neurocritical patients: a cohort study (Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, (2022), 36, 6, (1621-1628), 10.1007/s10877-022-00805-5). Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00885-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free