Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

82Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A continuous paravertebral block is used when pain relief is required beyond the duration of a single-injection paravertebral block. Surgical procedures requiring an incision into the pleural cavity are some of the most painful procedures postoperatively and, if not managed appropriately, can lead to chronic pain. The current gold standard for post-cardiothoracic surgery pain management is epidural analgesia, which has contraindications, a failure rate of up to 12% and risk of complications such as epidural abscess and spinal haematoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the use of a continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the continuous paravertebral block against epidural analgesia, wound infiltration, placebo or standard care (intravenous opioids) for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia were considered for inclusion in the systematic review. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases were searched from inception to 15 September 2014. Risk of bias and generalizability were assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted on suitable studies comparing the continuous paravertebral nerve block with epidural anaesthesia, with fixed-effects models being used to pool the effects. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with 1120 participants were included. The continuous paravertebral block was associated with a significant improvement in incidence of nausea and vomiting (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = [0.16, 0.56]), hypotension (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = [0.06, 0.41]) and urinary retention (odds ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval = [0.09, 0.52]) compared with the epidural block. No statistically significant difference in pain relief was reported. The continuous paravertebral block has equivalent analgesic effects to epidural analgesia, wound infiltration and standard care, but is associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, hypotension and urinary retention than epidural analgesia.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

14119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

6465Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS<sup>®</sup>) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)

880Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consensus statement: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enhanced Recovery for Cardiac Surgery

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scarfe, A. J., Schuhmann-Hingel, S., Duncan, J. K., Ma, N., Atukorale, Y. N., & Cameron, A. L. (2016, December 1). Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw168

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

57%

Researcher 10

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 60

88%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

6%

Psychology 2

3%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free