Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: Investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts

22Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: No comparisons of different doses of docetaxel-capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been performed. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic/locally advanced gastro-oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Two sequential cohorts received docetaxel 75 mg m2 (day 1) plus capecitabine 1000 mg m2 twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort I) or docetaxel 60 mg m2 (day 1) plus capecitabine 800 mg m2 twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort II) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was confirmed overall response rate. Results: In all, 91 patients were enrolled (cohort I, n=40; cohort II, n=51) and 87 were evaluable for efficacy (n=38, 49, respectively). Overall response rate was 50.0% in cohort I and 23.5% in cohort II (exploratory analysis, P=0.014). Median times to tumour progression and overall survival were 5.6 and 10.1 months in cohort I and 3.7 and 7.2 months in cohort II, respectively. Dose reductions for docetaxel and capecitabine were required in 50.0% and 57.5% of patients in cohort I and 11.8% and 15.7% in cohort II, respectively. Conclusion: Starting treatment with full doses and reducing promptly seems to be the more promisingly effective strategy than starting cautiously with lower doses. Docetaxel/capecitabine 75/2000 mg m 2 is a manageable, convenient outpatient combination with promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer. © 2011 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thuss-Patience, P. C., Kretzschmar, A., Dogan, Y., Rothmann, F., Blau, I., Schwaner, I., … Reichardt, P. (2011). Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: Investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts. British Journal of Cancer, 105(4), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.278

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free