Comparison of NAIP orthophotography and rapideye satellite imagery for mapping of mining and mine reclamation

Abstract

National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography is a potentially useful data source for land cover classification in the United States due to its nationwide and generally cloud-free coverage, low cost to the public, frequent update interval, and high spatial resolution. Nevertheless, there are challenges when working with NAIP imagery, especially regarding varying viewing geometry, radiometric normalization, and calibration. In this article, we compare NAIP orthophotography and RapidEye satellite imagery for high-resolution mapping of mining and mine reclamation within a mountaintop coal surface mine in the southern coalfields of West Virginia, USA. Two classification algorithms, support vector machines and random forests, were used to classify both data sets. Compared to the RapidEye classification, the NAIP classification resulted in lower overall accuracy and kappa and higher allocation disagreement and quantity disagreement. However, the accuracy of the NAIP classification was improved by reducing the number of classes mapped, using the near-infrared band, using textural measures and feature selection, and reducing the spatial resolution slightly by pixel aggregation or by applying a Gaussian low-pass filter. With such strategies, NAIP data can be a potential alternative to RapidEye satellite data for classification of surface mine land cover. © 2014 Taylor and Francis.