Imbroglios of Humans and Nonhumans

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The intent of Chapter 1 is to rectify the existing, human-centered discourses on the human–animal relation. If we ourselves are nature, as Bruno Latour, Gernot Böhme and some others allow, then we may study the unities and not the oppositions between humans and animals. First Donald Wesling proposes new concepts and terms for an animalist mode of interpretation; then he considers radical multispecies writers in science fiction (K.S. Robinson) and in the prose poem (László Krasznahorkai). Last in Chapter 1 he sets up Maurice Merleau-Ponty (d. 1961) as our best guide on the animal and human body as moving agent of perceiving and thinking. With terms from this phenomenological framework, literary readers may better attend to attention and may read more successfully for perceptual content.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wesling, D. (2019). Imbroglios of Humans and Nonhumans. In Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 1–40). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04969-0_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free