Comparing speed and osdi questionnaires in a non-clinical sample

19Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the performance of OSDI and SPEED questionnaires in a non-clinical sample in Pakistan. Methods: SPEED and OSDI questionnaires were simultaneously administered to a sample of 600 participants in Pakistan with an average age of 31.0 ± 10.1 years. Results: Mean SPEED scores were calculated according to the OSDI categories and were found to be 3.33 ± 3.44, 5.45 ± 3.77, 7.86 ± 4.33, and 9.39 ± 4.56 for the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Using Cronbach’s alpha, the total OSDI and SPEED scores were calculated to be 0.924 and 0.879, respectively. A receiver operating curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was estimated to be 0.791. Using this curve, the cutoff score for the SPEED questionnaire was found to be 4.00 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The SPEED questionnaire can be used as an effective alternative to the OSDI.

References Powered by Scopus

Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha

3982Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index

2370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dry Eye Disease: Impact on Quality of Life and Vision

318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dry eye disease and tear film assessment through a novel non-invasive ocular surface analyzer: The OSA protocol

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promising High-Tech Devices in Dry Eye Disease Diagnosis

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oral isotretinoin for acne vulgaris side effects on the ocular surface: Hyaluronic acid and galacto-xyloglucan as treatment for dry eye disease signs and symptoms

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hashmani, N., Munaf, U., Saleem, A., Javed, S. O., & Hashmani, S. (2021). Comparing speed and osdi questionnaires in a non-clinical sample. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 4169–4173. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S332565

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Immunology and Microbiology 1

9%

Psychology 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free