Type Coercion and Lexical Selection

  • Pustejovsky J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I will discuss how type-shifting is licensed in a language and what effect it has on the mapping from the lexicon to syntax. In particular, I will look at the phenomenon of type coercion, and how this behavior can be accounted for by the grammar in a systematic way. I suggest that the ambiguity exhibited by adjectives, aspectual verbs, experiencer verbs, and many causatives is the result of type coercion operations. That is, every lexical item exhibits some degree of ambiguity, what I call logical polysemy. This behavior is captured by enriching the lexical semantic representation for lexical items while also allowing a word’s semantic type to shift or be coerced in particular contexts. By allowing both verbs and nouns to shift in type, we can “spread the semantic load” in the lexicon more evenly, while still capturing the ways in which words can extend their meanings, i.e. the creative use of words.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pustejovsky, J. (1993). Type Coercion and Lexical Selection (pp. 73–94). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free