Arrhythmic risk profile in mitral valve prolapse: A systematic review and metanalysis of 1715 patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common clinical condition in the general population. A subgroup of patients with MVP may experience ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (“arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse” [AMVP]) but how to stratify arrhythmic risk is still unclear. Our meta-analysis aims to identify predictive factors for arrhythmic risk in patients with MVP. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Cochrane, Journals@Ovid, Scopus electronic databases for studies published up to December 28, 2022 and comparing AMVP and nonarrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (NAMVP) for what concerns history, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance features. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD). Results: A total of 10 studies enrolling 1715 patients were included. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (OR: 16.67; p =.005), T-wave inversion (TWI) (OR: 2.63; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pistelli, L., Vetta, G., Parlavecchio, A., Crea, P., Parisi, F., Magnocavallo, M., … Giustetto, C. (2024). Arrhythmic risk profile in mitral valve prolapse: A systematic review and metanalysis of 1715 patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 35(2), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free