On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jukola, S., & Canali, S. (2021). On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free