Who Shall Judge? Taiwan’s Exploration of Lay Participation in Criminal Trials

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

International human rights law does not demand lay participation in criminal trials. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that “everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law” but it does not dictate the composition of the tribunal. In recent years, Taiwan has tussled with the extent to which public access to observing trials should be transformed into direct public participation in the outcome of those trials. To date, however, the role that lay people will serve in the adjudication process remains contested. As Taiwan moves towards formulating a specific plan for lay participation, this chapter questions whether proponents of lay participation are expecting too much of the proposed reforms and encourages greater focus on how lay participation might impact the rights of the accused.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, M. K. (2019). Who Shall Judge? Taiwan’s Exploration of Lay Participation in Criminal Trials. In Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific (pp. 437–453). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0350-0_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free