A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights

486Citations
Citations of this article
812Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Strategies toward ambitious climate targets usually rely on the concept of 'decoupling'; that is, they aim at promoting economic growth while reducing the use of natural resources and GHG emissions. GDP growth coinciding with absolute reductions in emissions or resource use is denoted as 'absolute decoupling', as opposed to 'relative decoupling', where resource use or emissions increase less so than does GDP. Based on the bibliometric mapping in part I (Wiedenhofer et al, 2020 Environ. Res. Lett. 15 063002), we synthesize the evidence emerging from the selected 835 peer-reviewed articles. We evaluate empirical studies of decoupling related to final/useful energy, exergy, use of material resources, as well as CO2 and total GHG emissions. We find that relative decoupling is frequent for material use as well as GHG and CO2 emissions but not for useful exergy, a quality-based measure of energy use. Primary energy can be decoupled from GDP largely to the extent to which the conversion of primary energy to useful exergy is improved. Examples of absolute long-term decoupling are rare, but recently some industrialized countries have decoupled GDP from both production- A nd, weaklier, consumption-based CO2 emissions. We analyze policies or strategies in the decoupling literature by classifying them into three groups: (1) Green growth, if sufficient reductions of resource use or emissions were deemed possible without altering the growth trajectory. (2) Degrowth, if reductions of resource use or emissions were given priority over GDP growth. (3) Others, e.g. if the role of energy for GDP growth was analyzed without reference to climate change mitigation. We conclude that large rapid absolute reductions of resource use and GHG emissions cannot be achieved through observed decoupling rates, hence decoupling needs to be complemented by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets. More research is needed on interdependencies between wellbeing, resources and emissions.

References Powered by Scopus

Natural climate solutions

1980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis

1343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Negative emissions - Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects

997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scientists’ warning on affluence

689Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018

682Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario

315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., … Creutzig, F. (2020, June 1). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25060120180240

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 245

59%

Researcher 97

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 40

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 32

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 87

32%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 74

28%

Social Sciences 61

23%

Engineering 46

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 11
News Mentions: 59
References: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0