Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies

10Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Numerous guidelines recommend pairing Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) testing with a secondary clinical test when screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy, yet time is very limited in clinical practice. This study compared the time to complete and the diagnostic agreement of three vibratory sensation tests. Methods: Sixty-five individuals (42% male; aged: 61 ± 12 years) were recruited. A single investigator administered the following tests bilaterally: 10-site SWM, traditional tuning fork (TTF), electronic tuning fork (ETF), and vibration perception threshold (VPT) via biothesiometer. Times to physically administer the tests were compared with a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Cochran’s Q test was used to compare the varied tests’ diagnostic agreement. Results: The ANOVA indicated there were significant (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raymond, B., Steriovski, J., Gillyard, K. N., Yang, C., Wu, S. C., & Crews, R. T. (2020). Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819849478

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free