This study compared the in vitro marginal integrity of open-sandwich restorations based on aged calcium silicate cement versus resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Class II cavities were prepared on 30 extracted human third molars. These teeth were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 10) to compare a new hydraulic calcium silicate cement designed for restorative dentistry (Biodentine, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Ionolux, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) in open-sandwich restorations covered with a light-cured composite. Positive (n = 5) and negative (n = 5) controls were included. The teeth simultaneously underwent thermocycling and mechanocycling using a fatigue cycling machine (1,440 cycles, 5-55°C; 86,400 cycles, 50N/cm 2. The specimens were then stored in phosphate-buffered saline to simulate aging. After1 year, the teeth were submitted to glucose diffusion, and the resulting data were analyzed with a nonparametric Mann-Whitneytest. The Biodentine group and the Ionolux group presented glucose concentrations of 0.074 ± 0.035 g/L and 0.080 ± 0.032 g/L,respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups. Therefore, the calcium silicate-basedmaterial performs as well as the resin-modified glass ionomer cement in open-sandwich restorations. Copyright © 2012 S. Koubi et al.
CITATION STYLE
Koubi, S., Elmerini, H., Koubi, G., Tassery, H., & Camps, J. (2012). Quantitative evaluation by glucose diffusion of microleakage in aged calcium silicate-based open-sandwich restorations. International Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/105863
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.