Porous hollow carbon nanofibers derived from multi-walled carbon nanotubes and sucrose as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

19Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Porous hollow carbon nanofibers with tunable shell thicknesses from 2.5 to 13.5 nm have been synthesized via a hydrothermal approach by using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as the scaffolds and sucrose as carbon source. The thin, porous and non-graphitic carbon shells are revealed by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectra, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption isotherms. In comparison with the pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes, the as-prepared porous hollow carbon nanofibers exhibit the enhanced reversible capacities, cycling stabilities and rater performances when evaluated as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries.

References Powered by Scopus

Development and challenges of LiFePO<inf>4</inf> cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

1177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carbon nanotubes for lithium ion batteries

1086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent Advancement of Nanostructured Carbon for Energy Applications

735Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recent developments in electrode materials for potassium-ion batteries

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carbon nanotubes: A potential material for energy conversion and storage

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-doped carbon architectures with heteroatoms containing nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur as high-performance anodes for lithium- and sodium-ion batteries

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lei, W., Liu, S., & Zhang, W. H. (2017). Porous hollow carbon nanofibers derived from multi-walled carbon nanotubes and sucrose as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Advances, 7(1), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra24927b

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 3

43%

Materials Science 2

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Chemical Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free