The patient categorisation tool: psychometric evaluation of a tool to measure complexity of needs for rehabilitation in a large multicentre dataset from the United Kingdom

7Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This first psychometric evaluation of the Patient Categorisation Tool examined its properties as an instrument to measure complexity of needs in a mixed population of patients presenting for specialist neurorehabilitation. Materials/methods: Analysis of a large multicentre cohort of patients (n = 5396) from the national clinical dataset representing 63 specialist rehabilitation services across England. Structural validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent and criterion-validity were tested through a priori hypothesized relationships with other validated measures of resource requirements and dependency. Results: All but two items loaded strongly onto a single principal component with Cronbach’s alpha 0.88. A total score of ≥30 identified patients with complex (category A) needs with sensitivity 76% and specificity 75%. However, confirmatory factor analysis provided a better fit when the scale was split into two subscales–a 'Cognitive/psychosocial' and a 'Physical' sub-scale (alpha 0.83 and 0.84, respectively). Moderate convergent and discriminant correlations were consistent with hypothesized relationships. Conclusions: The findings provide some overall support for the Patient Categorisation Tool as a unidimensional tool for measuring complexity of needs for neurorehabilitation, but the subscales may be more suitable for certain groups of patients. Further analysis is now required to evaluate its performance in different conditions.Implications for Rehabilitation A psychometrically robust tool for measuring the complexity of rehabilitation needs has potential value, both at an individual level for treatment planning, and at a population level for planning and commissioning rehabilitation services. The Patient Categorisation Tool now forms part of the United Kingdom national clinical dataset mandated by the National Health Service in England This psychometric analysis from a large national multicentre cohort representing a diverse range of conditions, provides evidence for its validity as a means to identity patients with complex rehabilitation needs requiring specialist rehabilitation.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The scree test for the number of factors

9646Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification

9347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Developing a tool for disability accommodation complexity: A sequential mixed study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using therapy outcome measures to identify the speech and language therapy needs of children and young people with severe acquired brain injury

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner-Stokes, L., Krägeloh, C. U., & Siegert, R. J. (2019). The patient categorisation tool: psychometric evaluation of a tool to measure complexity of needs for rehabilitation in a large multicentre dataset from the United Kingdom. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(9), 1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1422033

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 10

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

32%

Psychology 6

32%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0