Why a Species-Based Approach to Biodiversity Is Not Enough. Lessons from Multispecies Biofilms

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, we have assisted to an impressive effort to identify and catalogue biodiversity at the microbial level across a wide range of environments, human bodies included (e.g., skin, oral cavity, intestines). This effort, fostered by the decreasing cost of DNA sequencing, highlighted not only the vast diversity at the microbial level but also the importance of cells’ social interactions, potentially leading to the emergence of novel diversity. In this contribution, we shall argue that entities other than species, and in particular multispecies biofilms, might play a crucial—and still underestimated—role in increasing biodiversity as well as in conserving it. In particular, after having discussed how microbial diversity impacts ecosystems (Sect. 9.1), we argue (Sect. 9.2) that multispecies biofilms may increase biodiversity at both the genetic and phenotypic level. In Sect. 9.3 we discuss the possibility that multispecies biofilms, both heterotrophic and autotrophic, are evolutionary individuals, i.e. units of selection. In the conclusion, we highlight a major limitation of the traditional species-based approach to biodiversity origination and conservation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marques da Silva, J., & Casetta, E. (2019). Why a Species-Based Approach to Biodiversity Is Not Enough. Lessons from Multispecies Biofilms. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (Vol. 24, pp. 195–217). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free