Prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factors in malignant salivary gland neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is a prognostic marker in several cancer types. In salivary gland tumors, the association between vascular endothelial growth factor and prognosis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with salivary gland neoplasms presents prognostic value. Material and Methods: Immunohistochemical studies assessing the predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor in salivary gland neoplasms were systematically reviewed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Co-chrane Library, and Web of Science databases. It was assessed any survival rates. The fixed-effect model with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as effect measures were performed in the meta-analysis. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the quality of the included stud-ies, and the evidence quality was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: The immunohistochemical overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with salivary gland neoplasms was associated with shortened survival (HR=5.37, 95% CI: 2.67-10.83, P = 0.00001). In addition, the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor was tightly associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, poor local control of the disease, and recurrence. Conclusions: The immunohistochemical overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with salivary gland neoplasms has prognostic value and was associated with decreased survival time. However, more primary well-designed studies are necessary to increase the level of evidence.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

54002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

12852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

5986Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Molecular Factors in Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interactive role of miR-29, miR-93, miR-205, and VEGF in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dos Santos, E. S., Ramos, J. C., Normando, A. G. C., & Leme, A. F. P. (2021). Prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factors in malignant salivary gland neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. Medicina Oral S.L. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23974

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0