Can Treatment Adherence Be Improved by Using Rubin's Four Tendencies Framework to Understand a Patient's Response to Expectations

  • Kirk J
  • MacDonald A
  • Lavender P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Within the context of poorer patient outcomes and rising healthcare costs, we need to better understand why many patients do not engage fully with their treatment plan. Movement away from talking about “compliance” towards “adherence” and “concordance” is evidence of a recognition that this is a two-way process. Whilst healthcare professionals expect patients to engage in treatment, equally, patients have expectations (whether positive or negative) of their treatment and their need for engagement. There is a need for an effective method that can specifically target those interventions that will provide the most benefit to individual patients and which, crucially, is easy and inexpensive to administer in everyday practice and widely applicable. Rubin's Four Tendencies model identifies a patient's “response to outer and inner expectations” as a key factor in adherence. The model therefore provides an opportunity to test such a targeted, patient-specific strategy and we present a call to action for research in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirk, J., MacDonald, A., Lavender, P., Dean, J., & Rubin, G. (2017). Can Treatment Adherence Be Improved by Using Rubin’s Four Tendencies Framework to Understand a Patient’s Response to Expectations. Biomedicine Hub, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000480347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free