Avaliação qualitativa de ambiência num centro de atenção psicossocial

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study is based on a cross-section of the study of Psychosocial Care Center (Caps) in the South of Brazil. Objective: to conduct a qualitative assessment of the structure, in terms of environment, of a Caps in the interior of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. A case study was conducted on the Caps in Alegrete (RS) based on a fourthgeneration, constructivist and responsive assessment using a hermeneutic-dialectic approach. The data collection instruments were semi-structured interviews with a team (26), users (11), and family members (14), defined as interest groups to make up the hermeneutic-dialectic circle and field observation (390 hours) establishing prior ethnography. The structure of the Alegrete Caps was a strong aspect in the environmental evaluation. The lack of human and material resources does not interfere directly in user satisfaction with the environment.

References Powered by Scopus

Stress in nursing work

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First psychotic crisis: Prodroms identification by patients and family members

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mental health services assessment in Brazil: Systematic literature review

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of care in the psychosocial care network: Experiences of users in the northeast of Brazil

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of care in two psychosocial care centers from the perspective of users

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kantorski, L. P., Coimbra, V. C. C., da Silva, E. N. F., Guedes, A. da C., Cortes, J. M., & dos Santos, F. (2011). Avaliação qualitativa de ambiência num centro de atenção psicossocial. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 16(4), 2059–2066. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000400005

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

43%

Social Sciences 4

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

14%

Arts and Humanities 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free