Phraseology in pathology reports. A comparative study of interpretation among pathologists and surgeons

39Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This questionnaire based study compared the interpretation, use and preferences, among pathologists and surgeons, of descriptive phrases found in surgical reports. The results show that there is a wide variation in individual interpretation of phrases in both groups. The frequency of usage of phrases by pathologists and preference for phrases by surgeons were also diverse. The adoption of a limited number of descriptive phrases that are mutually understood and acceptable for use by both pathologists and clinicians is recommended to avoid interpretive ambiguity in pathology reports.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Attanoos, R. L., Bull, A. D., Douglas-Jones, A. G., Fligelstone, L. J., & Semararo, D. (1996). Phraseology in pathology reports. A comparative study of interpretation among pathologists and surgeons. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 49(1), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.49.1.79

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free