Quality of life and hormones after sex reassignment surgery

36Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Transpeople often look for sex reassignment surgery (SRS) to improve their quality of life (QoL). The hormonal therapy has many positive effects before and after SRS. There are no studies about correlation between hormonal status and QoL after SRS. Aim: To gather information on QoL, quality of sexual life and body image in transpeople at least 2 years after SRS, to compare these results with a control group and to evaluate the relations between the chosen items and hormonal status. Subjects and methods: Data from 60 transsexuals and from 60 healthy matched controls were collected. Testosterone, estradiol, LH and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-100) self-reported questionnaire were evaluated. Student's t test was applied to compare transsexuals and controls. Multiple regression model was applied to evaluate WHOQOL's chosen items and LH. Results: The QoL and the quality of body image scores in transpeople were not statistically different from the matched control groups' ones. In the sexual life subscale, transwomen's scores were similar to biological women's ones, whereas transmen's scores were statistically lower than biological men's ones (P = 0.003). The quality of sexual life scored statistically lower in transmen than in transwomen (P = 0.048). A significant inverse relationship between LH and body image and between LH and quality of sexual life was found. Conclusions: This study highlights general satisfaction after SRS. In particular, transpeople's QoL turns out to be similar to Italian matched controls. LH resulted inversely correlated to body image and sexual life scores.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castellano, E., Crespi, C., Dell’Aquila, C., Rosato, R., Catalano, C., Mineccia, V., … Manieri, C. (2015). Quality of life and hormones after sex reassignment surgery. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 38(12), 1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0398-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free