Rethinking what counts. Perspectives on wellbeing and genuine progress indicator metrics from a Canadian viewpoint

9Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A prevailing undercurrent of doubt regarding the merits of economic growth has motivated efforts to rethink how we measure the success of economic policy and societal wellbeing. This article comments on efforts to better account for impacts of economic activity emphasizing genuine progress indicator (GPI) and wellbeing metrics from a Canadian viewpoint. The authors caution that GPI and related metrics are measures of human and social welfare and not adequate to account for the ecological costs associated with economic growth. In addition, the article discusses the suitability of wellbeing models and metrics for local scale applications, recognizing growing interest in these techniques at the urban and local level. The article concludes with a reflection on the uptake of GPI and wellbeing measures highlighting the Canadian experience. © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, J., & Tyedmers, P. (2013). Rethinking what counts. Perspectives on wellbeing and genuine progress indicator metrics from a Canadian viewpoint. Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010187

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free