Comparing performance of non-tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A central goal in the biomedical and biological sciences is to link variation in quantitative traits to locations along the genome (single nucleotide polymorphisms). Sequencing technology has rapidly advanced in recent decades, along with the statistical methodology to analyze genetic data. Two classes of association mapping methods exist: those that account for the evolutionary relatedness among individuals, and those that ignore the evolutionary relationships among individuals. While the former methods more fully use implicit information in the data, the latter methods are more flexible in the types of data they can handle. This study presents a comparison of the 2 types of association mapping methods when they are applied to simulated data.

References Powered by Scopus

The variant call format and VCFtools

10193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering

2383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator.

1452Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A comprehensive review of the characterization, host interactions, and stabilization advancements on probiotics: Addressing the challenges in functional food diversification

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thompson, K. L., & Fardo, D. W. (2016). Comparing performance of non-tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods. In BMC Proceedings (Vol. 10). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-016-0063-4

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0